↓ Skip to main content

Posterior optic buttonholing prevents intraocular pressure peaks after cataract surgery with primary posterior capsulorhexis

Overview of attention for article published in Graefe's Archive of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 1,228)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Posterior optic buttonholing prevents intraocular pressure peaks after cataract surgery with primary posterior capsulorhexis
Published in
Graefe's Archive of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00417-010-1454-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva Stifter, Rupert Menapace, Katharina Kriechbaum, Alexandra Luksch

Abstract

The performance of a primary posterior capsulorhexis (PPC) with and without posterior optic buttonholing (POBH) may significantly influence the intraocular pressure (IOP) after cataract surgery in age-related cataract patients.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 11%
Pakistan 1 11%
Unknown 7 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 33%
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 78%
Unspecified 2 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,691,718
of 12,220,741 outputs
Outputs from Graefe's Archive of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
#48
of 1,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,287
of 241,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Graefe's Archive of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,220,741 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,228 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.