Title |
Expressive aphasia in a patient with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
|
---|---|
Published in |
SpringerPlus, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/2193-1801-3-406 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Darwin F Yeung, Rose Hsu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 43% |
Researcher | 2 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 57% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 29% |
Linguistics | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,579,758
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#504
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,350
of 230,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#28
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.