↓ Skip to main content

Tilia trees: toxic or valuable resources for pollinators?

Overview of attention for article published in Apidologie, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Tilia trees: toxic or valuable resources for pollinators?
Published in
Apidologie, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13592-018-0581-3
Authors

Anne-Laure Jacquemart, Laura Moquet, Pierre Ouvrard, Joëlle Quetin-Leclercq, Marie-France Hérent, Muriel Quinet

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 35%
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 65%
Environmental Science 2 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,306,964
of 12,961,283 outputs
Outputs from Apidologie
#283
of 443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,734
of 316,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Apidologie
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,961,283 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 443 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.