| Title |
Human Remains Detection Dogs as a New Prospecting Method in Archaeology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10816-018-9406-y |
| Authors |
Vedrana Glavaš, Andrea Pintar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Croatia | 4 | 15% |
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 81% |
| Scientists | 4 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 17% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 228. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#172,038
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#7
of 373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,039
of 339,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them