| Title |
Fluid sparing and norepinephrine use in a rat model of resuscitated haemorrhagic shock: end-organ impact
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40635-018-0212-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie Dunberry-Poissant, Kim Gilbert, Caroline Bouchard, Frédérique Baril, Anne-Marie Cardinal, Sydnée L’Ecuyer, Mathieu Hylands, François Lamontagne, Guy Rousseau, Emmanuel Charbonney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 18% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2018.
All research outputs
#18,655,700
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#329
of 453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,221
of 344,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.