↓ Skip to main content

Water on Mars: Do submarine cyclic steps exist on the red planet?

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Water on Mars: Do submarine cyclic steps exist on the red planet?
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40645-018-0225-2
Authors

Svetlana Kostic, Isaac B. Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 22%
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Other 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 39%
Unspecified 4 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,227,115
of 23,914,787 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#113
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,491
of 346,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,914,787 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.