↓ Skip to main content

The final implant position of a commonly used collarless straight tapered stem design (Corail®) does not correlate with femoral neck resection height in cement-free total hip arthroplasty: a…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
The final implant position of a commonly used collarless straight tapered stem design (Corail®) does not correlate with femoral neck resection height in cement-free total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective computed tomography analysis
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s10195-018-0513-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Worlicek, Markus Weber, Michael Wörner, Timo Schwarz, Florian Zeman, Joachim Grifka, Tobias Renkawitz, Benjamin Craiovan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 17 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 42%
Engineering 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#13,718,294
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#99
of 222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,935
of 345,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them