@elkobadelko I love this paper of yours. https://t.co/eJBqg5WUr3 Does data like this make you rethink any of your arguments?
434 / #365papers: E. Clarke (2016), 'Levels of selection in biofilms: multispecies biofilms are not evolutionary individuals', Biology & Philosophy 31(2). https://t.co/zFbMshqRw9
Effective way to organize status of biological claims found in the literature. Found in Clarke (2016) on biofilms https://t.co/ZocE83baKf https://t.co/GLcaWX67l0
RT @alexnmayhem: We're wading into some controversy! #springerlink https://t.co/S6WInlM7Wc @aktipislab @athenaaktipis
We're wading into some controversy! #springerlink https://t.co/S6WInlM7Wc @aktipislab @athenaaktipis
Levels of selection in biofilms: multispecies biofilms are not evolutionary individuals https://t.co/fAxbhl4yzv
RT @chreliot: With implications for ecological units “Multispecies Biofilms Are Not Evolutionary Individuals,” new by @elkobadelko https://…
With implications for ecological units “Multispecies Biofilms Are Not Evolutionary Individuals,” new by @elkobadelko https://t.co/Jh2ac01J1i
Another point of view - Levels of selection in biofilms: multispecies biofilms are not evolutionary individuals https://t.co/MkGKK9XYVd