↓ Skip to main content

Mean arterial pressure and mortality in patients with distributive shock: a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-III database

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Mean arterial pressure and mortality in patients with distributive shock: a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-III database
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13613-018-0448-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Louis Vincent, Nathan D. Nielsen, Nathan I. Shapiro, Margaret E. Gerbasi, Aaron Grossman, Robin Doroff, Feng Zeng, Paul J. Young, James A. Russell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 14 12%
Other 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 34 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 42%
Engineering 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Computer Science 6 5%
Mathematics 4 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 39 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,999,684
of 23,924,386 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#544
of 1,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,542
of 355,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#12
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.