| Title |
Burned bodies: post-mortem computed tomography, an essential tool for modern forensic medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13244-018-0633-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J.-B. Coty, C. Nedelcu, S. Yahya, V. Dupont, C. Rougé-Maillart, M. Verschoore, C. Ridereau Zins, C. Aubé |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 1 | 17% |
| Chile | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 45 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 48 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,510,541
of 25,420,980 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#391
of 1,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,550
of 342,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,420,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.