@cyclingpro …speriamo non usino sostanze più efficaci visto che l’EPO…fonte: https://t.co/t3ytXE4POC https://t.co/hZ0YgVt1eO
Still thinking about this sometimes
@cbrennansports @YouTube https://t.co/M9utHkj2n5 For those who are here not for dome hype/harassment, but are really interested if the meds and the mentioned med in particular help with training.
@VanessaIdiong @thethaiflondon @Reuters This is an interesting medical journal paper that reviews all of the substances on WADA's banned substances list. They can't fine any scientific evidence that they enhance Athletic performance in most of them https:/
Time to tweet it again https://t.co/xenmdAxvdx.
@JonBello7 @arosenfee @SkatingScores It is not scientific proof, it is just an explanation why the authors perform their study. It might be easily false. The majority of substances on WADA list seem to be not backed scientifically https://t.co/LLYD5KOpyF
@mdsportex This 8% on the effects of substances/methods on physical performance is embarrassing considering the need to do quality research. See https://t.co/Ig6gAy6Scd and https://t.co/O247vbLCwf
@higgsmag Das gilt auch für andere Substanzen der WADA Liste. Die wenigsten haben solide Evidenz für Leistungssteigerung, und trotzdem werden sie verwendet und gelistet. https://t.co/eaypfxL633
@RBReich And you don't have to take my word for it. There's research that couldn't find any evidence of performance enhancement as well. https://t.co/vVdlPFOqR6
@KyleJamesHoward Here’s a counter argument (should be allowed, data inconclusive) https://t.co/PYwxSGmPy3
@marijnfietst @JordiLoon Dit zijn jammer genoeg wel weer verdachtmakingen zonder bewijs🥴 Als we dan toch bezig zijn met verdachtmakingen: welk middel denk je dat hij wilde maskeren? Er zijn erg weinig stoffen die werkelijk je prestaties bevorderen. https:/
Surprisingly that WADA ban on some substance is not evidence based – so do they need to revaluate their guidelines? https://t.co/pYDlbfqX8v
RT @lthomasnews: @IamTheImmortal @MagpieMcGraw Here you go: https://t.co/1CsgL853El. Emailing you another by @RogerPielkeJr that delves in…
@IamTheImmortal @MagpieMcGraw Here you go: https://t.co/1CsgL853El. Emailing you another by @RogerPielkeJr that delves into similar territory.
@groslik @docdu16 Heuberger et Cohen ont étudié les preuves d'efficacité des produits de la liste de l'Agence mondiale antidopage. Début 2019, leur article est en libre accès à cette adresse https://t.co/M2oevfedkV
Revisión de sustancias prohibidas de la WADA: limitada evidencia para el efecto de mejora del rendimiento 💠 No hay evidencia convincente disponible para mejorar el rendimiento. 💠 Evidencia se basa en un total de solo 266 sujetos de 11 estudios https://
RT @CaulfieldTim: Interesting analysis: "Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance‑Enhancing Effects" https://…
Czyżby pierwszy krok w stronę znoszenia, często dość absurdalnych, przepisów antydopingowych? Jeśli 5 z 23 wpływa na organizm, to trzeba koniecznie zmieniać przepisy. #doping
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
Something for horse racing to consider @RMTCnet @HorseIntegrity @RacingReform ....
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Interesting analysis: "Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance‑Enhancing Effects" https://…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Interesting analysis: "Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance‑Enhancing Effects" https://…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Interesting analysis: "Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance‑Enhancing Effects" https://…
Shorten the list. #doping #wada #enhancement
RT @CaulfieldTim: Interesting analysis: "Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance‑Enhancing Effects" https://…
There is more evidence for caffeine performance-enhancing effects than for most of the substances in the WADA prohibited list. But caffeine is not banned. Mmmmmn
RT @CaulfieldTim: Interesting analysis: "Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance‑Enhancing Effects" https://…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Interesting analysis: "Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance‑Enhancing Effects" https://…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Interesting analysis: "Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance‑Enhancing Effects" https://…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Interesting analysis: "Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance‑Enhancing Effects" https://…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Interesting analysis: "Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance‑Enhancing Effects" https://…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Interesting analysis: "Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance‑Enhancing Effects" https://…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Interesting analysis: "Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance‑Enhancing Effects" https://…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Interesting analysis: "Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance‑Enhancing Effects" https://…
Interesting analysis: "Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance‑Enhancing Effects" https://t.co/m27wgcX8JW cc @wada_ama @TStellingwerff @mackinprof @gibalam "for the majority of substance classes, no convincing evid for perf
RT @StephenSeiler: This is a paper worth talking about, but absence of evidence in this case can certainly not be deemed to equal evidence…
RT @StephenSeiler: This is a paper worth talking about, but absence of evidence in this case can certainly not be deemed to equal evidence…
This is a paper worth talking about, but absence of evidence in this case can certainly not be deemed to equal evidence of absence (of performance enhancing effects).
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @close_nutrition: Great post Brad. Is this an incredible waste of money and time. https://t.co/RT2bnydaXY
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance-Enhancing Effects (open access) https://t.co/KOTotRaBBS
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @close_nutrition: Great post Brad. Is this an incredible waste of money and time. https://t.co/RT2bnydaXY
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
Great post Brad. Is this an incredible waste of money and time.
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
RT @BradSchoenfeld: Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited L…
Uh.
Perhaps time to rethink anti-doping regulations? "Of all 23 specific substance classes defined in the 2018 Prohibited List, only five classes show evidence of having the ability to enhance actual sports performance." https://t.co/sXl6pE3tcf
Heubergerがまーたなんか変な論文出してた https://t.co/BpsiLfpvak 逆張り芸人のネタは尽きない。
RT @PauTomczyk: How to improve @wada_ama #antidoping ? Base the list on scientific evidence and limit it to substances used to improve perf…
RT @MAiSI_Erasmus: Interesting paper discussing the scientific evidence behind the Prohibited List.. Review of WADA Prohibited Substances:…
RT @PauTomczyk: How to improve @wada_ama #antidoping ? Base the list on scientific evidence and limit it to substances used to improve perf…
@mtulls @TJQuinnESPN I have. But maybe treating PED’s like they’re part of the war on drugs isn’t the right approach. https://t.co/uPTNNQvabF
RT @MiRandB13: .@MiRandB13 Hey, ASADA, WADA and CAS. "However, for most of these factors, including... thymosin-β4, there are no studies re…
Interesting paper discussing the scientific evidence behind the Prohibited List.. Review of WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance-Enhancing Effects https://t.co/EfBY1BYKwB
Dopinglijst langs de lat van de 'wetenschappelijke standaard' gelegd: slechts 5 van de 23 categorieën van verboden middelen doorstaan de toets. Let op: geschreven door dezelfde Leidse onderzoekers die twijfelen over prestatie-bevorderend effect van epo. ht
RT @PauTomczyk: How to improve @wada_ama #antidoping ? Base the list on scientific evidence and limit it to substances used to improve perf…
RT @PauTomczyk: How to improve @wada_ama #antidoping ? Base the list on scientific evidence and limit it to substances used to improve perf…
RT @PauTomczyk: How to improve @wada_ama #antidoping ? Base the list on scientific evidence and limit it to substances used to improve perf…
RT @PauTomczyk: How to improve @wada_ama #antidoping ? Base the list on scientific evidence and limit it to substances used to improve perf…
RT @PauTomczyk: How to improve @wada_ama #antidoping ? Base the list on scientific evidence and limit it to substances used to improve perf…
How to improve @wada_ama #antidoping ? Base the list on scientific evidence and limit it to substances used to improve performance, that would be an obvious first step. Interesting stuff from @RogerPielkeJr ⬇️⬇️⬇️
RT @MiRandB13: .@MiRandB13 Hey, ASADA, WADA and CAS. "However, for most of these factors, including... thymosin-β4, there are no studies re…
RT @EnhancementDrug: "Review of #WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance-Enhancing Effects": https://t.co/mp0D5sOYID F…
RT @EnhancementDrug: "Review of #WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance-Enhancing Effects": https://t.co/mp0D5sOYID F…
RT @tonsoffun: Open access people- give it a read 👍 https://t.co/3GK30tiWlr
RT @EnhancementDrug: "Review of #WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance-Enhancing Effects": https://t.co/mp0D5sOYID F…
RT @EnhancementDrug: "Review of #WADA Prohibited Substances: Limited Evidence for Performance-Enhancing Effects": https://t.co/mp0D5sOYID F…
RT @tonsoffun: Open access people- give it a read 👍 https://t.co/3GK30tiWlr
Open access people- give it a read 👍
RT @MiRandB13: .@MiRandB13 Hey, ASADA, WADA and CAS. "However, for most of these factors, including... thymosin-β4, there are no studies re…
Oh oh. So that list will never be amended then. Can't imagine @wada_ama wanting to deal with a motherload of condemnation after removing TB4 from it....again....
Keep the good work up Wald.D,
RT @MiRandB13: .@MiRandB13 Hey, ASADA, WADA and CAS. "However, for most of these factors, including... thymosin-β4, there are no studies re…