↓ Skip to main content

The Phenomenon of False Assumption in Historical and Educational Texts

Overview of attention for article published in Science Education, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
The Phenomenon of False Assumption in Historical and Educational Texts
Published in
Science Education, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11191-018-0005-9
Authors

Jiří Přibyl, Petr Eisenmann, Ján Gunčaga

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,778,797
of 12,902,491 outputs
Outputs from Science Education
#245
of 477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,723
of 299,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Education
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,902,491 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 477 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.