↓ Skip to main content

Summary of the proceedings of the International Summit 2015: General and subspecialty radiology

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Summary of the proceedings of the International Summit 2015: General and subspecialty radiology
Published in
Insights into Imaging, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13244-015-0453-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Abstract

The need for subspecialisation in radiology and the relationship of general and subspecialist radiologists is very diverse in different regions of the world according to the reports presented at the ESR International Summit, organised by the ESR during the European Congress of Radiology in March 2015 in Vienna. The International Summit is held once a year by the ESR and its national and international radiological partner societies from outside Europe with the aim to address and discuss selected subjects of global relevance in radiology. In 2015, the relationship between general and subspecialist radiologists was analysed. It was shown that the situation differs immensely between developed and developing countries; in developed countries, a considerable proportion of radiologists are subspecialty trained; subspecialty radiologists practise mainly in large and academic departments, and many radiologists practise as multispecialty radiologists. In many developing countries only general radiologists-if available at all-practise radiology, and imaging interpretation is often performed by physicians with very limited relevant training or in some cases even by non-physicians. • Subspecialisation and preservation of the integrity of the radiology profession are relevant for improved patient care. • Subspecialisation is needed in large departments, providing the basis for innovation and research. • Subspecialty sections should preferably remain within the overarching radiology department. • Shared facilities, efficient use of resources and common organisational structures are beneficial. • A multispecialty radiologist model is an option to build robust academic and private practices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Master 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 13 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,005,706
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#473
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,144
of 403,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.