| Title |
The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the History of Biology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10739-018-9538-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn Maxson Jones, Rachel A. Ankeny, Robert Cook-Deegan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 39% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 55% |
| Scientists | 13 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 22% |
| Unknown | 31 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 15 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 41 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,783,413
of 25,299,129 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Biology
#21
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,276
of 358,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Biology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,299,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.