↓ Skip to main content

Elevated level of nerve growth factor in the bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Elevated level of nerve growth factor in the bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis: a meta-analysis
Published in
SpringerPlus, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-2719-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Chen, Da-Yong Ye, Deng-Jun Han, Guang-Qing Fu, Xiang Zeng, Wei Lin, Yong Liang

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Master 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 41%
Environmental Science 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,605,381
of 13,715,693 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#866
of 1,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,010
of 308,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,715,693 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them