↓ Skip to main content

Toward reduction of the uncertainties in climate sensitivity due to cloud processes using a global non-hydrostatic atmospheric model

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Toward reduction of the uncertainties in climate sensitivity due to cloud processes using a global non-hydrostatic atmospheric model
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40645-018-0226-1
Authors

Masaki Satoh, Akira T. Noda, Tatsuya Seiki, Ying-Wen Chen, Chihiro Kodama, Yohei Yamada, Naomi Kuba, Yousuke Sato

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 44%
Engineering 6 15%
Computer Science 3 7%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,498,853
of 24,247,965 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#123
of 558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,459
of 354,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,247,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.