Title |
Catch the ruler: concurrent validity and test–retest reliability of the ReacStick measures of reaction time and inhibitory executive function in older people
|
---|---|
Published in |
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s40520-018-1050-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kimberley S. van Schooten, Lionne Duran, Maike Visschedijk, Mirjam Pijnappels, Stephen R. Lord, James Richardson, Kim Delbaere |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 13% |
Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 5 | 63% |
Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
Researcher | 8 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Professor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 21 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 12% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 10% |
Psychology | 7 | 10% |
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 32 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,209,370
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#601
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,202
of 357,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.