↓ Skip to main content

Measuring serum concentrations of interleukin-33 in atopic dermatitis is associated with potential false positive results

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Measuring serum concentrations of interleukin-33 in atopic dermatitis is associated with potential false positive results
Published in
SpringerPlus, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-1673-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uffe Nygaard, Christian Vestergaard, Claus Johansen, Mette Deleuran, Malene Hvid

Abstract

In the search for valid biomarkers in inflammatory diseases, cytokine serum concentrations are often measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and correlated to disease activity. Interleukin-33 is a relatively newly described cytokine, which holds a promising potential as a biomarker for different diseases including atopic dermatitis. However, interfering human anti-animal IgG antibodies and heterophilic antibodies might give rise to false positive or negative results that often go unnoticed. We performed a three-step validation of commercially available and widely used human interleukin-33 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit with serum samples from eight atopic dermatitis patients and five healthy controls. Through addition of unspecific animal IgG (rabbit, mouse, goat and bovine) and unspecific human IgG to the assay diluent, we disclosed false positive values in 12 out of 13 samples. This study show that the present human interleukin-33 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit might give rise to a high prevalence of false positive values if not validated. This inaccuracy is easily eliminated with a simple set of validation steps.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 24%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 41%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,226,436
of 22,840,638 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#456
of 1,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,846
of 395,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#33
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,840,638 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.