↓ Skip to main content

Feeling Lucky: The Serendipitous Nature of Field Education

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Social Work Journal, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Feeling Lucky: The Serendipitous Nature of Field Education
Published in
Clinical Social Work Journal, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10615-018-0688-z
Authors

Kathryn Hay, Jane Maidment, Neil Ballantyne, Liz Beddoe, Shayne Walker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 17%
Professor 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 67%
Psychology 1 17%
Unspecified 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,675,438
of 13,411,977 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Social Work Journal
#193
of 1,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,419
of 311,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Social Work Journal
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,411,977 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,001 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.