| Title |
Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Educational Psychology Review, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ming-Te Wang, Jessica L. Degol |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 22% |
| Paraguay | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Nigeria | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 87% |
| Scientists | 6 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 149 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 127 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 104 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 97 | 9% |
| Researcher | 79 | 7% |
| Other | 219 | 20% |
| Unknown | 343 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 202 | 18% |
| Psychology | 115 | 10% |
| Engineering | 58 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 46 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 40 | 4% |
| Other | 270 | 24% |
| Unknown | 387 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 197. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#206,055
of 25,888,065 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#15
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,350
of 404,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.