| Title |
Changes in cardiac arrest patients’ temperature management after the 2013 “TTM” trial: results from an international survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-015-0104-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolas Deye, François Vincent, Philippe Michel, Stephan Ehrmann, Daniel da Silva, Michael Piagnerelli, Antoine Kimmoun, Olfa Hamzaoui, Jean-Claude Lacherade, Bernard de Jonghe, Florence Brouard, Corinne Audoin, Xavier Monnet, Pierre-François Laterre, For the SRLF Trial Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Italy | 1 | 13% |
| Poland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 25% |
| Unknown | 30 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 36 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,304,457
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#712
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,562
of 407,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.