↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of diagnostic effects of infrared imaging and bitewing radiography in proximal caries of permanent teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Lasers in Medical Science, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of diagnostic effects of infrared imaging and bitewing radiography in proximal caries of permanent teeth
Published in
Lasers in Medical Science, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10103-018-2663-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arghavan Tonkaboni, Aida Saffarpour, Ferial Aghapourzangeneh, Mohammad Javad Kharazi Fard

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 33%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 50%
Unspecified 2 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2018.
All research outputs
#12,107,570
of 13,640,418 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Medical Science
#770
of 910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,534
of 312,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Medical Science
#15
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,640,418 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 910 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.