↓ Skip to main content

Automatically composing reusable software components for mobile devices

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Brazilian Computer Society, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Automatically composing reusable software components for mobile devices
Published in
Journal of Brazilian Computer Society, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/bf03192550
Authors

Jules White, Douglas C. Schmidt, Egon Wuchner, Andrey Nechypurenko

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
France 1 4%
Belgium 1 4%
Slovenia 1 4%
Unknown 22 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 38%
Student > Master 8 31%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 24 92%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Brazilian Computer Society
#14
of 65 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,884
of 95,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Brazilian Computer Society
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them