↓ Skip to main content

TIMSS data in an African comparative perspective: Investigating the factors influencing achievement in mathematics and their psychometric properties

Overview of attention for article published in Large-scale Assessments in Education, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
TIMSS data in an African comparative perspective: Investigating the factors influencing achievement in mathematics and their psychometric properties
Published in
Large-scale Assessments in Education, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40536-015-0014-y
Authors

Emmanuel Adu-tutu Bofah, Markku S. Hannula

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
Unknown 93 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Master 12 13%
Lecturer 9 10%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 36 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 15 16%
Mathematics 14 15%
Psychology 8 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 7%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 38 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2015.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Large-scale Assessments in Education
#147
of 172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,502
of 401,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Large-scale Assessments in Education
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.