↓ Skip to main content

Systemic antifungal therapy for proven or suspected invasive candidiasis: the AmarCAND 2 study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Systemic antifungal therapy for proven or suspected invasive candidiasis: the AmarCAND 2 study
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13613-015-0103-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivier Leroy, Sébastien Bailly, Jean-Pierre Gangneux, Jean-Paul Mira, Patrick Devos, Hervé Dupont, Philippe Montravers, Pierre-François Perrigault, Jean-Michel Constantin, Didier Guillemot, Elie Azoulay, Olivier Lortholary, Caroline Bensoussan, Jean-François Timsit, AmarCAND2 study group

Abstract

In the context of recent guidelines on invasive candidiasis (IC), how French intensive care units (ICUs) are managing IC? This is a prospective observational multicenter cohort study. During 1 year (2012-2013), 87 French ICUs enrolled consecutive patients with suspected or proven IC (SIC or PIC) and receiving systemic antifungal therapy (SAT). Data were collected up to 28 days after inclusion. We studied 835 patients, 291 with PIC and 544 with SIC. At SAT initiation, patients with SIC were significantly more severe (SAPS II 50.1 ± 18.7 vs. 46.2 ± 18.0). Severe sepsis or septic shock prompted to initiate empiric SAT in 70 % of SIC. Within 4 days in median, the initial SAT was modified in 49 % of patients with PIC vs. 33 % patients with SIC. Modifications were most often motivated by mycological results, and de-escalation was the most frequent change. Regarding compliance to IC management guidelines, echinocandin was used for 182 (62.5 %) patients with PIC, and 287 (52.7 %) of those with SIC; central venous catheter was removed in 87 (54.3 %) of patients with candidaemia, and 43 of the remaining patients received echinocandin; and de-escalation was undertaken after 5 days of SAT in 142 patients, after 10 days in 13 patients. As 20.6 % of SIC were secondarily documented, 403/835 (48 %) patients had finally a proven IC. Candida albicans was the main pathogen (65.3 %), then Candida glabrata (15.9 %). The 28-day mortality rates were 40.0 % in candidaemia, 25.4 % in cIAI, and 26.7 % in deep-seated candidiasis. In the overall population of patients with proven IC, four independent prognostic factors were identified: immunosuppression (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.977: 1.03-3.794 95 % confidence interval (CI), p = 0.04), age (OR = 1.035; 1.017-1.053 95 % CI; p < 0.001), SAPS >46 on ICU admission (OR = 2.894; 1.81-4.626 95 % CI; p < 0.001), and surgery just before or during ICU stay (OR = 0.473; 0.29-0.77 95 % CI; p < 0.001). When SAT is initiated in French ICUs, the IC is ultimately proven for 48 % of patients. Empiric SAT is initiated in severely ill ICU patients. The initial SAT is often adapted, with de-escalation to fluconazole when possible. Mortality rate remains high.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 15%
Other 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 20 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,724,706
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#431
of 1,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,532
of 395,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.