| Title |
Quantitative evaluation of milling effects on lignin structure during the isolation process of milled wood lignin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wood Science, February 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10086-004-0682-7 |
| Authors |
Aya Fujimoto, Yuji Matsumoto, Hou-Min Chang, Gyosuke Meshitsuka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 21 | 26% |
| Chemical Engineering | 10 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,577,096
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wood Science
#58
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,860
of 142,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wood Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them