Title |
Tau neuropathology correlates with FDG-PET, but not AV-1451-PET, in progressive supranuclear palsy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00401-016-1650-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ruben Smith, Michael Schöll, Michael Honer, Christer F. Nilsson, Elisabet Englund, Oskar Hansson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 13% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Professor | 4 | 9% |
Other | 11 | 24% |
Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 41% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
Psychology | 3 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,321,406
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#565
of 2,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,368
of 417,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#11
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.