Title |
Impacts of the invader giant reed (Arundo donax) on riparian habitats and ground arthropod communities
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biological Invasions, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10530-015-1044-7 |
Authors |
Alberto Maceda-Veiga, Helena Basas, Gerard Lanzaco, Miquel Sala, Adolfo de Sostoa, Antoni Serra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 76 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 23% |
Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 38% |
Environmental Science | 20 | 25% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2020.
All research outputs
#875,543
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#109
of 2,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,538
of 395,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.