↓ Skip to main content

Early X-ray workers: an effort to assess their numbers, risk, and most common (skin) affliction

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Early X-ray workers: an effort to assess their numbers, risk, and most common (skin) affliction
Published in
Insights into Imaging, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13244-015-0457-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerrit J. Kemerink, Jos M. A. van Engelshoven, Kees J. Simon, Gerhard Kütterer, Joachim E. Wildberger

Abstract

To assess quantitatively the number of early X-ray workers, their risk of becoming a radiation victim, and their most common radiation-induced (skin) disease. Information on professional life and occupational disease was retrieved from the Ehrenbuch, a book of honour containing biographies of 404 radiation victims, as well as member and congress lists of the German and US radiological societies, obituaries, books, articles, and the Internet. The estimated numbers of X-ray users in a medical setting in the US increased from about 300 to 600 in 1900-1903, in Germany from about 700 to 1200 during 1905-1908. The risk for a beginning user eventually to die from radiation was 1-2 % in these years, but up to 10-25 % in 1896. Data on 198 victims of fatal radiation-induced skin disease were collected. The incidence of the various stages of skin afflictions with a fatal outcome was characterized by very wide distributions. After 1896, the radiation risk decreased very fast at first and more slowly thereafter to nearly zero in 1935. Many victims became quite old, partly because of the slower progress of tissue reactions at lower radiation doses, partly because of the success of often multiple surgical interventions. US and German X-ray users amounted to several hundreds to thousand in 1900-1908. The risk eventually to die from radiation was about 1-2 % during 1900-1908. After 1896, this risk decreased from >10 % to nearly zero in 1935. The incidence of subsequent stages of skin harm varied strongly in time. X-ray victims could become quite old, dependent on radiation dose and surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 27%
Student > Bachelor 3 27%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Physics and Astronomy 2 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2016.
All research outputs
#19,702,729
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#847
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,917
of 401,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.