| Title |
The benefits and limitations of animal models for translational research in cartilage repair
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40634-015-0037-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Conor J. Moran, Ashwanth Ramesh, Pieter A. J. Brama, John M. O’Byrne, Fergal J. O’Brien, Tanya J. Levingstone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 5 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 266 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 16% |
| Researcher | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 14% |
| Unknown | 67 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 37 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 18% |
| Unknown | 77 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#5,397,832
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#52
of 446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,318
of 406,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them