↓ Skip to main content

Stand management optimization – the role of simplifications

Overview of attention for article published in Forest Ecosystems, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Stand management optimization – the role of simplifications
Published in
Forest Ecosystems, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/2197-5620-1-3
Authors

Timo Pukkala, Erkki Lähde, Olavi Laiho

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 30%
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Forest Ecosystems
#227
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,264
of 235,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Ecosystems
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.