| Title |
DNA barcoding of traded shark fins, meat and mobulid gill plates in Singapore uncovers numerous threatened species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-018-1108-1 |
| Authors |
Benjamin J. Wainwright, Yin Cheong Aden Ip, Mei Lin Neo, Jia Jin Marc Chang, Chester Zhikai Gan, Naomi Clark-Shen, Danwei Huang, Madhu Rao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 153 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 26 | 17% |
| United States | 15 | 10% |
| Canada | 6 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 5 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Singapore | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 69 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 125 | 82% |
| Scientists | 25 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2019.
All research outputs
#355,663
of 25,870,142 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#7
of 1,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,538
of 357,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.