↓ Skip to main content

Proceedings of Réanimation 2018, the French Intensive Care Society International Congress

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
Title
Proceedings of Réanimation 2018, the French Intensive Care Society International Congress
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13613-017-0345-7
Pubmed ID
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 282 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 14%
Student > Master 33 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 6%
Researcher 13 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 38 13%
Unknown 128 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 14%
Computer Science 9 3%
Psychology 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 140 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,546,615
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#837
of 1,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,522
of 437,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#27
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.