↓ Skip to main content

Assessing student paramedic visual and verbal checks for defibrillation safety—an observational study

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Assessing student paramedic visual and verbal checks for defibrillation safety—an observational study
Published in
SpringerPlus, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-1570-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malcolm J. Boyle, Brett Williams, Linda Ross

Abstract

One of the cornerstones in resuscitation training is defibrillation safety, inadvertent "shocking" of the patient when another person has contact with the patient may have a range of safety consequences. The objective of the study was to assess visual and verbal safety checks by paramedic students prior to defibrillation. This was a prospective observational mannequin study of defibrillation safety during a simulated cardiac arrest by paramedic students. The study was conducted in the lounge room of the Department of Community Emergency Health & Paramedic Practice simulation flat, a replica of a complete flat where prehospital simulations are conducted. Each student completed two 10-min cardiac arrest simulations with multiple defibrillation attempts. Each student and an independent Faculty member rated the simulation safety performance using a defibrillation safety self-assessment (DSSA) form. Twenty-four (20 %) students participated in the study with 14 (58 %) being female. For scenario one agreement between student and assessor proved significant for "scanning the incident scene" for all three defibrillation attempts, with agreement ranging from 29 % (p = 0.044) to 47 % (p = 0.007), and stating "stand clear" for defibrillation attempt one and three with the agreement ranging from 47 % (p = 0.007) to 100 % (p < 0.001). For scenario two agreement between student and assessor proved significant for "charging eye contact" for all three defibrillation attempts, with agreement ranging from 40 % (p = 0.043) to 53 % (p = 0.003), and "scanning the scene to ensure all persons are clear of the patient" before defibrillation attempt one and two with agreement ranging from 29 % (p = 0.044) to 46 % (p < 0.007). The results of this study suggest student perception of their performance and what they actually do is vastly different. Further studies using video recording glasses are required so students can gain an accurate and realistic sense of their defibrillation safety performance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Engineering 2 9%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 39%