↓ Skip to main content

The role of spleen in the treatment of experimental lipopolysaccharide-induced sepsis with dexmedetomidine

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
The role of spleen in the treatment of experimental lipopolysaccharide-induced sepsis with dexmedetomidine
Published in
SpringerPlus, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-1598-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhaoguo Liu, Yaoqi Wang, Qiaoqing Ning, Chunzhi Gong, Yong Zhang, Li Zhang, Xiangmei Bu, Guangjian Jing

Abstract

Dexmedetomidine (Dex), a highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, has been shown to attenuate systemic inflammatory response induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The protective effects of Dex may reportedly be due to the activation of the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7nAChR)-dependent cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. Spleen has been shown to play a pivotal role in the neural cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. However, little is known about the specific function of spleen in the protective effects of Dex against sepsis. To investigate the role of spleen in the treatment of Dex against sepsis, we studied the effects of preemptive administration of Dex to septic mice on the NF-κB p65 activation and downstream pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in the spleen. Our results provided evidence that Dex treatment attenuated LPS-activated NF-κB p65 activation, as well as the production of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1β at the level of both mRNA and protein in spleen. Consequently, serum concentrations of these cytokines decreased. Conversely, preemptive injection of α-bungarotoxin, a selective α7nAChR antagonist, reversed these effects of Dex. Our findings indicated that spleen played a critical role in the protective effects of Dex against sepsis and provided further insight into the anti-inflammatory mechanisms of Dex.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Lecturer 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 12%
Neuroscience 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 10 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,299,108
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#1,459
of 1,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,731
of 390,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#133
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.