RT @markamerica: More evidence.
RT @markamerica: More evidence. https://t.co/JRwtHxjIYu
RT @markamerica: More evidence. https://t.co/JRwtHxjIYu
More evidence.
Money from Fauci's NIAID funded research conducted by Shi Zhengli, Wuhan Institute of Virology's Center https://t.co/MzRVaGtdwu https://t.co/bFEgdzzQSh https://t.co/phD5MLMcnb https://t.co/fN986DaWhH https://t.co/oZjXHIBV44 https://t.co/hnPP1rFoeq https:/
Gain of Function Research receipts #FireFauci
@srikosuri @AAMortazavi @R_H_Ebright @gdemaneuf In fact, Wuhan was used as a negative control in this study.. https://t.co/1VXMWz0F3H
RT @MartinaSisters: Esto me llevó a investigar si se habían realizado pruebas en animales de laboratorio para estudiar estos codones de rep…
Si bueno el Dr @BidoliNicola dá lo máximo. Gracias
Esto me llevó a investigar si se habían realizado pruebas en animales de laboratorio para estudiar estos codones de repetición. Y el documento aportado por @BidoliNicola 🤗 ayudó a poner en relación a Zeng-Li con experimentos con anticuerpos de conejo. http
RT @pepesgrandma: October 2015, 6 people out of 240 randomly tested people in 4 villages in Jinning County, China, tested positive for mult…
@RadioJud No se puede afirmar si fue por esto, ahora que se investigaba este virus en Wuhan previo a la pandemia es factico https://t.co/37RSFxozdz https://t.co/wc5ys8L2fN 2018: https://t.co/qWQZmO01bM https://t.co/Owcp4S5LkK
"As a control, we also collected 240 serum samples from random blood donors in 2015 in #Wuhan, Hubei Province more than 1000 km away from Jinning (Fig. 1A) and where inhabitants have a much lower likelihood of contact with bats due to its urban setting." h
@LyceumWC @CDCDirector @DrEricDing @TheJusticeDept @NIH @POTUS Also, ALL may be interested in the Daszak/Shi work described here ; https://t.co/79m3iaP0JJ
RT @ErinSandersNP: 9/ In the lab, they were able to infect human cells and then mice with these viruses causing a “SARS-like” disease. Blo…
RT @Rossana38510044: @stgoldst @medpagetoday @nature @TheLancet We all know that that this paper is highly biased https://t.co/6Qf57xumel h…
@stgoldst @medpagetoday @nature @TheLancet We all know that that this paper is highly biased https://t.co/6Qf57xumel https://t.co/uoYMeSnpXA Frankly, it's hard to understand why @stgoldst wouldn't know all that.
@stuartjdneil Agree.. But the probability of a zoonotic spillover happening in Wuhan is low.. See this seroprevalence study in which Wuhan was in fact used as a negative control.. https://t.co/1VXMWz0F3H
@stuartjdneil Seroprevalence in Yunnan? If you're hinging on the linked paper (that tested 218 people who live right next to the caves where SARSr-CoV infected bats live, found 6 positives & concluded spillover is rare) make sure you use it only in op
@InWuchang @K_G_Andersen @JoelMan2 @andrewsacher This study in fact used Wuhan as a negative control https://t.co/1VXMWz0F3H
@BCNThomson @K_G_Andersen There is serological evidence for low level spread of these SARS-like viruses in the areas very close to the bat caves. These areas are rural so SARS-like viruses not adept to human to human transmission won't spread widely https:
RT @Ayjchan: The question is, how did SARS-CoV-2 get to Wuhan, "the sprawling capital of Central China’s Hubei province", a commercial cent…
@MccairnDr @polster_stefan @clif_high
RT @darachm: @JamesTo07577300 @stgoldst No, but we do detect it. Ex: this serology study estimated ~2.8% (6/218) prevalence of SARS-like co…
@mblum_g @nbierne @babarlelephant @jfjulien @fffeeerrr68 prends stp le temps de regarder ça https://t.co/PtRRbwcdFC
RT @Ayjchan: In contrast to the interview, the paper says “2.7% seropositivity for the high risk group of residents living in close proximi…
@thehill I have to say, a few things support the COVID lab theory especially: COVID's original bat virus wasn't locally native - it was traced to a distant, remote cave in Yunnan province; where a researcher from the lab had collected bat viral samples to
@JamesTo07577300 @stgoldst No, but we do detect it. Ex: this serology study estimated ~2.8% (6/218) prevalence of SARS-like coronavirus infection in rural China. The question isn't why this one emerged, it's why the millions of other spillovers never took