↓ Skip to main content

Prevention and treatment of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: an update

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
Title
Prevention and treatment of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: an update
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13613-015-0095-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick M. Honore, Rita Jacobs, Inne Hendrickx, Sean M. Bagshaw, Olivier Joannes-Boyau, Willem Boer, Elisabeth De Waele, Viola Van Gorp, Herbert D. Spapen

Abstract

Sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (SAKI) remains an important challenge in critical care medicine. We reviewed current available evidence on prevention and treatment of SAKI with focus on some recent advances and developments. Prevention of SAKI starts with early and ample fluid resuscitation preferentially with crystalloid solutions. Balanced crystalloids have no proven superior benefit. Renal function can be evaluated by measuring lactate clearance rate, renal Doppler, or central venous oxygenation monitoring. Assuring sufficiently high central venous oxygenation most optimally prevents SAKI, especially in the post-operative setting, whereas lactate clearance better assesses mortality risk when SAKI is present. Although the adverse effects of an excessive "kidney afterload" are increasingly recognized, there is actually no consensus regarding an optimal central venous pressure. Noradrenaline is the vasopressor of choice for preventing SAKI. Intra-abdominal hypertension, a potent trigger of AKI in post-operative and trauma patients, should not be neglected in sepsis. Early renal replacement therapy (RRT) is recommended in fluid-overloaded patients' refractory to diuretics but compelling evidence about its usefulness is still lacking. Continuous RRT (CRRT) is advocated, though not sustained by convincing data, as the preferred modality in hemodynamically unstable SAKI. Diuretics should be avoided in the absence of hypervolemia. Antimicrobial dosing during CRRT needs to be thoroughly reconsidered to assure adequate infection control.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 180 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 26 14%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 43 23%
Unknown 45 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 47 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,133,231
of 22,836,570 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#462
of 1,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,076
of 389,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,836,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.