| Title |
How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-018-0061-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanne Greenhalgh, Kate Gooding, Elizabeth Gibbons, Sonia Dalkin, Judy Wright, Jose Valderas, Nick Black |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 30% |
| Australia | 5 | 9% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Ireland | 3 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 62% |
| Scientists | 15 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 350 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 12% |
| Researcher | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 63 | 18% |
| Unknown | 129 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Psychology | 13 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 11% |
| Unknown | 147 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,235,878
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#12
of 679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,779
of 349,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.