↓ Skip to main content

Aggressive NK-cell leukemia in a 69 years old Caucasian woman: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Aggressive NK-cell leukemia in a 69 years old Caucasian woman: a case report
Published in
SpringerPlus, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-1553-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Maj Hyldig Matzen, Klaus Kallenbach, Anne Regitze Reumert, Lars Munksgaard

Abstract

Aggressive NK-cell leukemia is a rare malignancy mostly seen in younger Asians with a rapid clinical course and poor prognosis. Here, we describe a 69 years old Caucasian woman presenting with massive leukemization of neoplastic NK-cells. The cells were abnormal in morphology and surface marker expression and this clearly distinguished them from their normal counterpart. They were large and variable in shapes with irregular folding of the nuclei. By flow cytometry, their light scatter characteristics resembled normal monocytes. They showed bright expression of CD56 and CD2 but markedly decreased expression of CD7. They also expressed CD25. The patient presented with general malaise, including high fever, abdominal pain, signs and haemophagocytosis, and she quickly deteriorated and died 11 days after hospitalization. The origin of the leukemic cells of aggressive NK-cell leukemia is most likely the relatively scarce population of CD56(bright) NK-cells, primarily residing lymph nodes and tonsils. The immunophenotype of the case presented here support this, adding CD25 expression which is not earlier addressed in this entity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Librarian 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2015.
All research outputs
#14,830,048
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#835
of 1,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,430
of 389,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#55
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.