↓ Skip to main content

Nanoscale Science and Technology and People with Disabilities in Asia: An Ability Expectation Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in NanoEthics, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Nanoscale Science and Technology and People with Disabilities in Asia: An Ability Expectation Analysis
Published in
NanoEthics, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11569-012-0148-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregor Wolbring, Natalie Ball

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Student > Master 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 50%
Arts and Humanities 2 17%
Philosophy 2 17%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,011,242
of 12,196,902 outputs
Outputs from NanoEthics
#80
of 159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,515
of 303,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NanoEthics
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,196,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 159 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.