↓ Skip to main content

Lung anatomy, energy load, and ventilator-induced lung injury

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Lung anatomy, energy load, and ventilator-induced lung injury
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40635-015-0070-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Protti, Davide T. Andreis, Marta Milesi, Giacomo E. Iapichino, Massimo Monti, Beatrice Comini, Paola Pugni, Valentina Melis, Alessandro Santini, Daniele Dondossola, Stefano Gatti, Luciano Lombardi, Emiliano Votta, Eleonora Carlesso, Luciano Gattinoni

Abstract

High tidal volume can cause ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), but positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is thought to be protective. We aimed to find the volumetric VILI threshold and see whether PEEP is protective per se or indirectly. In 76 pigs (22 ± 2 kg), we examined the lower and upper limits (30.9-59.7 mL/kg) of inspiratory capacity by computed tomography (CT) scan at 45 cmH2O pressure. The pigs underwent a 54-h mechanical ventilation with a global strain ((tidal volume (dynamic) + PEEP volume (static))/functional residual capacity) from 0.45 to 5.56. The dynamic strain ranged from 18 to 100 % of global strain. Twenty-nine pigs were ventilated with end-inspiratory volumes below the lower limit of inspiratory capacity (group "Below"), 38 within (group "Within"), and 9 above (group "Above"). VILI was defined as death and/or increased lung weight. "Below" pigs did not develop VILI; "Within" pigs developed lung edema, and 52 % died before the end of the experiment. The amount of edema was significantly related to dynamic strain (edema 188-153 × dynamic strain, R (2) = 0.48, p < 0.0001). In the "Above" group, 66 % of the pigs rapidly died but lung weight did not increase significantly. In pigs ventilated with similar tidal volume adding PEEP significantly increased mortality. The threshold for VILI is the lower limit of inspiratory capacity. Below this threshold, VILI does not occur. Within these limits, severe/lethal VILI occurs depending on the dynamic component. Above inspiratory capacity stress at rupture may occur. In healthy lungs, PEEP is protective only if associated with a reduced tidal volume; otherwise, it has no effect or is harmful.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 136 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Postgraduate 19 14%
Other 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 35 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 57%
Engineering 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 37 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,229,289
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#179
of 468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,191
of 393,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.