↓ Skip to main content

Screening of patients with augmented renal clearance in ICU: taking into account the CKD-EPI equation, the age, and the cause of admission

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Screening of patients with augmented renal clearance in ICU: taking into account the CKD-EPI equation, the age, and the cause of admission
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13613-015-0090-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stéphanie Ruiz, Vincent Minville, Karim Asehnoune, Marie Virtos, Bernard Georges, Olivier Fourcade, Jean-Marie Conil

Abstract

In ICU patients with normal serum creatinine (SCr), a state of increased renal drug excretion has been described (creatinine clearance ≥130 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), and named augmented renal clearance (ARC). In ICU patients, the accuracy of GFR estimates is insufficient. However, in clinical practice, the physician has not at one's disposal patient measured creatinine clearance (CrCl) when prescribing. The primary objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of 4 formulas to estimate GFR (Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Robert, sMDRD, and CKD-EPI formulas) with other covariates to detect ARC in ICU patients. We enroled 360 consecutive ICU patients with normal SCr in this prospective observational study conducted in a primary teaching hospital. Comparisons between CrCl values and 4 estimated GFR (eGFR) formulas were estimated. In these 360 patients, ARC was observed in 33 % of patients most of them trauma. Individual predictive values of equations were poor and the phenomenon increased in ARC subgroup. CG and CKD-EPI were more accurate to detect an ARC. Multivariable analysis showed that the best-fitting model included 3 factors independently correlated to ARC: trauma patients, cut-off values of age ≤58 years, and CKD-EPI more than 108 ml/min/1.73 m(2). In ICU patients with normal SCr, eGFR formulas are imprecise in assessing CrCl. If measured CrCl must be ideally used to detect modifications of the renal function, in clinical practice, age, reason for admission, and CKD-EPI could be used as screening tool to identify ARC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,298,249
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#956
of 1,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,164
of 389,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#25
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.