↓ Skip to main content

Implications of copy number variation in people with chromosomal abnormalities: potential for greater variation in copy number state may contribute to variability of phenotype

Overview of attention for article published in The HUGO Journal, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Implications of copy number variation in people with chromosomal abnormalities: potential for greater variation in copy number state may contribute to variability of phenotype
Published in
The HUGO Journal, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11568-010-9144-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam J. de Smith, Anne L. Trewick, Alexandra I. F. Blakemore

Abstract

Copy number variation is common in the human genome with many regions, overlapping thousands of genes, now known to be deleted or amplified. Aneuploidies and other forms of chromosomal imbalance have a wide range of adverse phenotypes and are a common cause of birth defects resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. "Normal" copy number variants (CNVs) embedded within the regions of chromosome imbalance may affect the clinical outcomes by altering the local copy number of important genes or regulatory regions: this could alleviate or exacerbate certain phenotypes. In this way CNVs may contribute to the clinical variability seen in many disorders caused by chromosomal abnormalities, such as the congenital heart defects (CHD) seen in ~40% of Down's syndrome (DS) patients. Investigation of CNVs may therefore help to pinpoint critical genes or regulatory elements, elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying these conditions, also shedding light on the aetiology of such phenotypes in people without major chromosome imbalances, and ultimately leading to their improved detection and treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Belgium 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Computer Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2021.
All research outputs
#18,301,870
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from The HUGO Journal
#14
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,609
of 94,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The HUGO Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one scored the same or higher as 5 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them