↓ Skip to main content

Hierarchical fixed points of strictly pseudo contractive mappings for variational inequality problems

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Hierarchical fixed points of strictly pseudo contractive mappings for variational inequality problems
Published in
SpringerPlus, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-540
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanom Chamnarnpan, Nopparat Wairojjana, Poom Kumam

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 25%
Computer Science 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,298,249
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#1,460
of 1,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,290
of 211,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#98
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.