↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial biofilm formation inside colonic crypts may accelerate colorectal carcinogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Medicine, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Bacterial biofilm formation inside colonic crypts may accelerate colorectal carcinogenesis
Published in
Clinical and Translational Medicine, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40169-018-0209-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hans Raskov, Kasper Nørskov Kragh, Thomas Bjarnsholt, Mahdi Alamili, Ismail Gögenur

Abstract

Research in the field of relation between microbes and colorectal carcinogenesis has gained increasing interest in past years. Recently, link between microbial biofilm and carcinogenesis in colon was demonstrated by several authors indicating that biofilm not only is a key player in carcinogenesis, but also may contribute to the understanding of side-specific colon cancer-right sided colon cancer versus left sided. In this article, we briefly highlight the major findings of the research of biofilm and carcinogenesis and demonstrate our findings of colonic cancer tissue and colonic polyp examined for biofilm. Colonic cancer tissue from a patient with a right-sided colon cancer, and an adenoma tubular polyp were examined for biofilm formation by flourescens in situ hybridization. In cancer tissue we found biofilm formation on the surface epithelium but surprisingly also deep into the crypts. No biofilms were found in tubular polyp tissue. To our knowledge, this is the first-time biofilm formation deep into colonic crypts are demonstrated in a patient with right-sided colon cancer. This may indicate that bacterial biofilm may have a key role in carcinogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Other 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2018.
All research outputs
#6,435,662
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#245
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,472
of 350,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them