↓ Skip to main content

Tools and evaluation methods for discussion and presentation skills training

Overview of attention for article published in Smart Learning Environments, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Tools and evaluation methods for discussion and presentation skills training
Published in
Smart Learning Environments, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40561-015-0011-1
Authors

Katashi Nagao, Mehrdad Panahpour Tehrani, Jovilyn Therese B Fajardo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 9 26%
Social Sciences 8 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Unknown 15 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,351,145
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Smart Learning Environments
#125
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,326
of 255,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Smart Learning Environments
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.