| Title |
JMSS-1: a new Martian soil simulant
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earth, Planets and Space, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40623-015-0248-5 |
| Authors |
Xiaojia Zeng, Xiongyao Li, Shijie Wang, Shijie Li, Nicole Spring, Hong Tang, Yang Li, Junming Feng |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 20% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 21 | 38% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 14% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#1,108
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,157
of 280,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.