↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) fermented by Rhizopus oligosporus and its bioactive properties

Overview of attention for article published in AMB Express, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Characterization of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) fermented by Rhizopus oligosporus and its bioactive properties
Published in
AMB Express, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13568-018-0675-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaewon Hur, Thi Thanh Hanh Nguyen, Namhyeon Park, Jeesoo Kim, Doman Kim

Abstract

Quinoa is a pseudocereal that contains high quality protein, minerals, vitamins, polyphenols, and phytosterols. In this study, quinoa was fermented by Rhizopus oligosporus (R. oligosporus) up to 5 days and the functional compounds (L-carnitine, GABA, vanillic acid and gallic acid) were analyzed by LC/MS. The amounts of L-carnitine and GABA were 0.13 mg/kg and 540 mg/kg for nonfermented quinoa (NF), 3.15 mg/kg and 1040 mg/kg for fermented quinoa at 3 days (3F), and 1.54 mg/kg and 810 mg/kg for fermented quinoa at 5 days (5F). The vanillic acid and gallic acid were 1.3 and 0.1 mg/kg for NF, 1.55 and 2.37 mg/kg for 3F, and 1.83 and 0.84 mg/kg for 5F, respectively. Total phenolic contents and total flavonoids contents were 41 mg gallic acid (GAE)/kg and 13 mg quercetin equivalent (QE)/kg for NF, 74 mg GAE/kg and 16 mg QE/kg for 3F, and 80 mg GAE/kg and 19 mg QE/kg for 5F, respectively. Antioxidant activity (SC50) was 3.6 mg/mL for NF, 3.4 mg/mL for 3F, and 2.3 mg/mL for 5F. Nitric oxide production on RAW264.7 macrophages of fermented quinoa revealed 29% and 56% inhibition of nitric oxide production for NF and 5F, respectively. Therefore, fermented quinoa can be used as a healthy and valuable food product.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 21 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Engineering 4 6%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 23 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,533,292
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from AMB Express
#976
of 1,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,647
of 337,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMB Express
#30
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,245 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.