Title |
Protocol for the “Implementation, adoption, and utility of family history in diverse care settings” study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13012-015-0352-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
R. Ryanne Wu, Rachel A. Myers, Catherine A. McCarty, David Dimmock, Michael Farrell, Deanna Cross, Troy D. Chinevere, Geoffrey S. Ginsburg, Lori A. Orlando, for the Family Health History Network |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 25% |
China | 1 | 8% |
Colombia | 1 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 159 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 28 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
Researcher | 17 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
Other | 24 | 15% |
Unknown | 47 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
Computer Science | 6 | 4% |
Other | 25 | 16% |
Unknown | 51 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,566,795
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#978
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,201
of 395,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#21
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.