↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of radiation protection awareness and knowledge about radiological examination doses among Italian radiographers

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of radiation protection awareness and knowledge about radiological examination doses among Italian radiographers
Published in
Insights into Imaging, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13244-015-0445-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Paolicchi, F. Miniati, L. Bastiani, L. Faggioni, A. Ciaramella, I. Creonti, C. Sottocornola, C. Dionisi, D. Caramella

Abstract

To evaluate radiation protection basic knowledge and dose assessment for radiological procedures among Italian radiographers METHODS: A validated questionnaire was distributed to 780 participants with balanced demographic characteristics and geographic distribution. Only 12.1 % of participants attended radiation protection courses on a regular basis. Despite 90 % of radiographers stating to have sufficient awareness of radiation protection issues, most of them underestimated the radiation dose of almost all radiological procedures. About 5 % and 4 % of the participants, respectively, claimed that pelvis magnetic resonance imaging and abdominal ultrasound exposed patients to radiation. On the contrary, 7.0 % of the radiographers stated that mammography does not use ionising radiation. About half of participants believed that radiation-induced cancer is not dependent on age or gender and were not able to differentiate between deterministic and stochastic effects. Young radiographers (with less than 3 years of experience) showed a higher level of knowledge compared with the more experienced radiographers. There is a substantial need for radiographers to improve their awareness of radiation protection issues and their knowledge of radiological procedures. Specific actions such as regular training courses for both undergraduate and postgraduate students as well as for working radiographers must be considered in order to assure patient safety during radiological examinations. • Radiographers should improve their knowledge on radiation protection issues. • Only 12.1 % of participants attended radiation protection courses on a regular basis. • Specific actions must be considered in order to increase knowledge and awareness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 299 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 74 25%
Student > Master 26 9%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 6%
Other 12 4%
Other 34 11%
Unknown 119 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 76 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 54 18%
Physics and Astronomy 10 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 24 8%
Unknown 124 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#5,882,423
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#329
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,091
of 394,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.